Hello,
I want to make a comparison between a CAD-Modell and a point cloud. Generally this works well. But with some of my measurements I have problems.
I found out, that the scanner was wrong configured, that means in millimeter instead of meters. Now my point cloud is too small for a good registration.
Is it possible to scale the point cloud that it is in the same size as the CAD modell?
THX
Ozi
Problems with comparison between CAD Modell and Point cloud
Re: Problems with comparison between CAD Modell and Point cloud
Use the 'Edit > Multiply / Scale' method.
Daniel, CloudCompare admin
Re: Problems with comparison between CAD Modell and Point cloud
I tried it but this was not working
Meanwhile I corrected the data with EXCEL, not it is running well
THX
Ozi
Meanwhile I corrected the data with EXCEL, not it is running well
THX
Ozi
Re: Problems with comparison between CAD Modell and Point cloud
Hi! i'm new user in CC.
i have problem - when upload pts and fbx files I get different scales.
in the source files the scale is the same...
i have problem - when upload pts and fbx files I get different scales.
in the source files the scale is the same...
- Attachments
-
- Снимок.JPG (34.48 KiB) Viewed 2097 times
Re: Problems with comparison between CAD Modell and Point cloud
How did you asserted this?when upload pts and fbx files I get different scales.
The only solution would be that there's a scaling value somewhere in the FBX file that is not taken into account by CC (however we use the official FBX SDK to load the FBX files...).
If you can give me the right scale and the files I could search where the missing information is (you can send mail to cloudcompare [at] danielgm.net).
Daniel, CloudCompare admin
Re: Problems with comparison between CAD Modell and Point cloud
This model in Navisworks (Autodesk). According to this model, a building was constructed. We scanned the building and compared with the model in Navisworks. all converges. I get the file FBX through export from Navisworks. I think the problem is in the export.daniel wrote:
How did you asserted this?
- Attachments
-
- 1.jpg (189.58 KiB) Viewed 2087 times
-
- 2.JPG (214.78 KiB) Viewed 2087 times