aha, Daniel. I just found this: I ran the compiled program remotely via Windows Remote Desktop Connection and had the error. However, if I just started the program locally, it worked great. So, it seems that the 2.10 and 2.11 beta do not support Remote Desktop while the 2.6.3 does.
I control my ...
Search found 3 matches
- Thu Apr 04, 2019 10:56 pm
- Forum: Windows related topics
- Topic: compiled successfully, but cannot run
- Replies: 4
- Views: 82724
- Thu Apr 04, 2019 10:32 pm
- Forum: Windows related topics
- Topic: compiled successfully, but cannot run
- Replies: 4
- Views: 82724
Re: compiled successfully, but cannot run
My graphic card is NVIDIA TITAN Xp.
I tried both 2.10 and 2.11 alpha. Neither can start. However, the 2.6.3 beta can run nicely.
I also tested the executables in another older Dell computer (Win7 64bit, with probably built in graphic card see attached picture). I got the same results (i.e., both 2 ...
I tried both 2.10 and 2.11 alpha. Neither can start. However, the 2.6.3 beta can run nicely.
I also tested the executables in another older Dell computer (Win7 64bit, with probably built in graphic card see attached picture). I got the same results (i.e., both 2 ...
- Wed Apr 03, 2019 9:58 pm
- Forum: Windows related topics
- Topic: compiled successfully, but cannot run
- Replies: 4
- Views: 82724
compiled successfully, but cannot run
Dear Daniel,
I compiled the program successfully, but when I ran it, I got the error as shown in the attached picture error.png. It seems that there is a problem to call Qt5Cored.dll.
Would you please advise what might cause the error? This is other information for your diagnosis:
1) I am using ...
I compiled the program successfully, but when I ran it, I got the error as shown in the attached picture error.png. It seems that there is a problem to call Qt5Cored.dll.
Would you please advise what might cause the error? This is other information for your diagnosis:
1) I am using ...