Search found 3 matches
- Tue May 14, 2013 7:14 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: inferential statics in Ruwen Schnabel's article
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5700
Re: inferential statics in Ruwen Schnabel's article
I'm still not sure that r=1 is a good case as if you only have one subset, there's no point in doing all this optimization and random sampling scheme. It seems that Ruwen Schnabel has not published any paper after 2010... You could ask another member of its former laboratory (Reinhard Klein for ins...
- Tue May 14, 2013 3:52 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: inferential statics in Ruwen Schnabel's article
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5700
Re: inferential statics in Ruwen Schnabel's article
First, I must admit that I've not studied this paper in depth (I mainly integrated Schnabel's library in a plugin and played with the parameter a bit after a quick overview of his paper). But here are a few guesses: Obviously, you need at least 3 points to define the simplest shape (a plane) so a c...
- Sun May 12, 2013 9:33 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: inferential statics in Ruwen Schnabel's article
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5700
inferential statics in Ruwen Schnabel's article
yesterday,i read Ruwen Schnabel's article "Efficient RANSAC for Point-Cloud Shape Detection",there are some points i can't understand In "4.5 Score evaluation" part,he say we can get the score on the all points with the inferential statics 1、i can't understand the meaning of the ...