Search found 19 matches
- Tue Aug 23, 2016 10:41 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
- Replies: 35
- Views: 71901
Re: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
any ideas what could have caused the shifts?
- Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:33 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
- Replies: 35
- Views: 71901
Re: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
btw: you'll definitely get a big "thank you"-spot in my bachelor-thesis :D dunno what i'd have done without you.
- Thu Aug 18, 2016 11:07 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
- Replies: 35
- Views: 71901
Re: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
here are the results of the volume-calcuation AFTER registrating the clouds to the 6h-cloud.
6-7:
Volume: -0.005
Surface: 90.133
----------------------
Added volume: (+)0.176
Removed volume: (-)0.181
----------------------
Matching cells: 99.5%
Non-matching cells:
ground = 0.2%
ceil = 0.2 ...
6-7:
Volume: -0.005
Surface: 90.133
----------------------
Added volume: (+)0.176
Removed volume: (-)0.181
----------------------
Matching cells: 99.5%
Non-matching cells:
ground = 0.2%
ceil = 0.2 ...
- Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:08 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
- Replies: 35
- Views: 71901
Re: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
i just had a look on the locations of the compared clouds (7-13) relating to the reference cloud (6h):
7h:
behind + left shifted
8h:
a little bit behind + minimal shifted to the left
9h:
nearly identical to 7h
10h:
nearly identical to 6h tiny bit in front and a bit to the right
11h:
a bit ...
7h:
behind + left shifted
8h:
a little bit behind + minimal shifted to the left
9h:
nearly identical to 7h
10h:
nearly identical to 6h tiny bit in front and a bit to the right
11h:
a bit ...
- Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:59 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
- Replies: 35
- Views: 71901
Re: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
the surface values are kind of steady (differences caused by the empty cells again i guess) but as you can see the volume-calculation differs a lot.
edit: i just recognized that the 13h-cloud has a defect. there are some missing points because of a ship which covered a part of the wall. that's why ...
edit: i just recognized that the 13h-cloud has a defect. there are some missing points because of a ship which covered a part of the wall. that's why ...
- Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:55 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
- Replies: 35
- Views: 71901
Re: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
Ah ok ;)
So here are the results with an increased grid-size toi 0.04:
6-7h:
Volume: -11.677
Surface: 100.179
----------------------
Added volume: (+)0.001
Removed volume: (-)11.678
----------------------
Matching cells: 99.2%
Non-matching cells:
ground = 0.4%
ceil = 0.4%
Average neighbors per ...
So here are the results with an increased grid-size toi 0.04:
6-7h:
Volume: -11.677
Surface: 100.179
----------------------
Added volume: (+)0.001
Removed volume: (-)11.678
----------------------
Matching cells: 99.2%
Non-matching cells:
ground = 0.4%
ceil = 0.4%
Average neighbors per ...
- Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:52 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
- Replies: 35
- Views: 71901
Re: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
Hi Daniel,
i will try it in an hour but it still doesn't justify the big shifts between the scans. at least for the m3c2-distances there will be huge differences.. i don't know what happened there.
i will try it in an hour but it still doesn't justify the big shifts between the scans. at least for the m3c2-distances there will be huge differences.. i don't know what happened there.
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:39 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
- Replies: 35
- Views: 71901
Re: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
Since the volume-calculation at 7h (volume: -11.420) and 9h (volume: -11.774) was quite similar, i did a comparison between these two clouds:
Volume: -0.407
Surface: 99.832
----------------------
Added volume: (+)0.158
Removed volume: (-)0.565
----------------------
Matching cells: 93.2%
Non ...
Volume: -0.407
Surface: 99.832
----------------------
Added volume: (+)0.158
Removed volume: (-)0.565
----------------------
Matching cells: 93.2%
Non ...
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 10:54 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
- Replies: 35
- Views: 71901
Re: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
Hey Daniel,
you were right! it was just the missing shader :)
though i would be really thankful if you could have a look at the volume-calculation for the 2nd standpoint. after croppping the clouds to the same extends i get some really weird calculations. i know i'm really annoying but i need your ...
you were right! it was just the missing shader :)
though i would be really thankful if you could have a look at the volume-calculation for the 2nd standpoint. after croppping the clouds to the same extends i get some really weird calculations. i know i'm really annoying but i need your ...
- Mon Aug 15, 2016 12:14 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
- Replies: 35
- Views: 71901
Re: compare clouds for deformation-analysis
At the picture below you can see my display params and how it looks:
http://www.directupload.net/file/d/4448 ... gt_png.htm
http://www.directupload.net/file/d/4448 ... 9f_png.htm
your screenshots look way better.
http://www.directupload.net/file/d/4448 ... gt_png.htm
http://www.directupload.net/file/d/4448 ... 9f_png.htm
your screenshots look way better.