CloudCompare forum

It looks like there is a scalar field (you can activate/display the color scale in the cloud properties). But the cloud is very sparse. Maybe you can reduce the default subsampling step for Core points generation (or simply use the original points if your cloud is not that big).

Maybe you are selecting the folder including the mesh and not the mesh itself? Or the vertices and not the mesh?

So CloudCompy is a different project (here I was suggesting to use 'Python Runtime'). For CloudCompy, you'll have to follow the instruction on the project website or on its github page: https://github.com/CloudCompare/CloudComPy/blob/master/README.md It's also more efficient to ask questions on both...

I'm not the expert, but I believe as long as the other tiles have the same density and objects of the same scale, then the classifier should work on these tiles as well.

And you can normally automate the process via the command line.

I was going to say, only the zoom/scale is adjusted to the point cloud extents, but not the orientation. Have you tried to set your camera once, and then save the 'viewport' as an object? CTRL+V (or Display > Save viewport as object). Then you can save this viewport in a dedicated BIN file, and relo...

Maybe that's a question for the authors, but I believe you can use 3Dmasc with a single cloud?

Oh, and is the scale of the cloud in CloudCompare ok?

Sadly, it's hard to debug such an issue. Have you been able to load the DXF file in another SW? Have you even tried to reload the DXF file in CloudCompare?

Alors tout d'abord, il faut utiliser une version récente. Ensuite, il faut charger le fichier géoréférencé en acceptant le "Global Shift" (et de manière à ce que les coordonnées locales soit < 1000 typiquement. Ensuite il faut que ce nuage géoréférencé soit la "référence" et le n...

Well, the 'unroll' happens about the axis, so changing it will change the result obviously.

Maybe there's an issue with the coordinate system? Hard to say without more information ;)