CloudCompare forum

Following up on this topic, is there a way to fuse the results of multiple M3C2 comparisons? For example, performing comparisons along several preferential directions (X, Y, and Z), then merging the results into a single cloud while preserving the values (e.g. merged histograms) and a consistent ...

I used the provided M3C2 parameters and found that switching to Multi-Scale calculation mode and aligning the structures at the bottom was actually more effective for the intended comparison. Now, we do obtain logical scale values. thank you very much for the help provided.
That said, the output ...

Thank you very much Daniel for looking at the file and searching suitable M3C2 parameters. I will work on it and see if I obtain similar output.

The objects are small, but not that small. That said I did try scaling up the object by a factor of 1000, but the results remained the same. I’ve sent the files to the provided email address, thank you.

Thank you for the explanation and for recommending the M3C2 plugin. I’ve tested it, but the computed distances still appear underestimated, despite adjusting several parameters, including forcing the normal direction to be vertical.
For context, the geometries are on the micrometer scale. Could this ...

Thank you very much for the support provided on this forum.

I am currently comparing two structures: a reference model that is 100 units tall, and an experimental one approximately 20 units in height. The two structures are centered for the comparison.
The result of the C2M comparison shows an ...